There are two types of eviction cases: eviction only cases and eviction with back rent cases, where the landlord is suing for both return of the property and back rent. Eviction only cases are normally filed for non-rent related reasons, such as alleged lease infractions or that tenants stayed beyond the end of their lease term, though some landlords who are owed back rent forgo their claim and choose to sue for eviction only. Eviction with back rent cases indicate that rent may be owed, but there may also be additional non-rent related reasons the landlord is suing for eviction. Landlord claims make no distinction between tenants who could not pay rent and tenants who legally withheld their rent (for repairs or other allowed reasons), a fact that often only comes to light if tenants are able to assert their rights in court.
Eviction with Back Rent Cases (%) presented with eviction filing rate. Select "2010" to display 2010 values, "2019" for 2019 values, or "Avg" to display 10-year averages (this is the default display).
| Tract | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Tract | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tract 3301.00 | 95.7% | 93.9% | 87.6% | 83.2% | 84.9% | 89.6% | 78.5% | 92.6% | 92.7% | 90.9% | Tract 3301.00 | About 100% housing and 100% population |
| Tract 3302.00 | 82.9% | 83.3% | 87.5% | 87.2% | 87.5% | 91.7% | 88.9% | 81% | 96.7% | 82.8% | Tract 3302.00 | About 100% housing and 100% population |
| Tract 3406.00 | 75% | 67.7% | 68.8% | 78.1% | 92.9% | 66.7% | 72.7% | 100% | 0% | 80% | Tract 3406.00 | About 100% housing and 100% population |
| Tract 3504.00 | 16.7% | 57.1% | 79.1% | 71.6% | 84% | 89.7% | 95.8% | 100% | 94.1% | 69.2% | Tract 3504.00 | |
| Tract 3514.00 | 79.2% | 64.3% | 77.3% | 79% | 96% | 84.2% | 100% | 75% | 91.7% | 91.7% | Tract 3514.00 | |
| Tract 3515.00 | 75% | 30% | 0% | 100% | 100% | 66.7% | 100% | 87.5% | 90.9% | 33.3% | Tract 3515.00 | |
| Tract 3802.00 | 86.1% | 81.8% | 76.7% | 88.2% | 90.9% | 85.7% | 78.8% | 84.6% | 79.3% | 77.8% | Tract 3802.00 | |
| Tract 3805.00 | 76.9% | 82.8% | 93.8% | 89.2% | 100% | 100% | 90.9% | 100% | 83.3% | 100% | Tract 3805.00 | |
| Tract 3807.00 | 60% | 90% | 79.3% | 85.7% | 81.8% | 95% | 100% | 86.4% | 95.5% | 64.5% | Tract 3807.00 | |
| Tract 3812.00 | 94.3% | 80.4% | 87% | 82.2% | 93.6% | 77.5% | 94.1% | 75% | 79.2% | 86.8% | Tract 3812.00 | About 93% housing and 93% population |
| Tract 3814.00 | 72.7% | 85.7% | 88.9% | 78.7% | 90.7% | 92.3% | 89.2% | 91.4% | 100% | 72.9% | Tract 3814.00 | |
| Tract 3815.00 | 90% | 100% | 37.5% | 76.9% | 100% | 80% | 100% | 88.5% | 92.6% | 85.7% | Tract 3815.00 | |
| Tract 3817.00 | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 100% | 0% | 100% | Tract 3817.00 | |
| Tract 3818.00 | 81% | 91.3% | 79.2% | 85.2% | 85.7% | 90.3% | 100% | 95.7% | 93.3% | 84.6% | Tract 3818.00 | |
| Tract 3819.00 | 70.6% | 96.3% | 95.7% | 72.7% | 86.4% | 75% | 73.3% | 81% | 90.5% | 83.3% | Tract 3819.00 | About 36% housing and 39% population |
| Tract 4003.00 | 86.7% | 94.4% | 89.3% | 66.7% | 89.7% | 88.9% | 92.3% | 94.4% | 96% | 66.7% | Tract 4003.00 | About 100% housing and 100% population |
| Tract 4004.00 | 80.7% | 79.2% | 60.4% | 78.6% | 92.1% | 68.2% | 89.1% | 83.9% | 80.7% | 67.7% | Tract 4004.00 | About 1% housing and 2% population |
| Tract 4005.00 | 80.9% | 91.1% | 86.7% | 85% | 82.4% | 93.4% | 89.4% | 90.4% | 96.4% | 70.4% | Tract 4005.00 | About 0% housing and 0% population |
| Tract 8345.00 | 78.4% | 100% | 86.8% | 90.9% | 90% | 75.8% | 81.5% | 93.3% | 100% | 70.3% | Tract 8345.00 | About 15% housing and 17% population |
| Tract 8346.00 | 61% | 65.6% | 74.3% | 74.3% | 78.6% | 92.6% | 85% | 81.5% | 75% | 61.1% | Tract 8346.00 | About 19% housing and 21% population |
| Tract 8355.00 | 75% | 63.2% | 78.6% | 64.6% | 77.4% | 80.7% | 76.5% | 80% | 58.3% | 77.8% | Tract 8355.00 | About 100% housing and 100% population |
| Tract 8356.00 | 75% | 60% | 91.7% | 90.9% | 70% | 60% | 90% | 80% | 66.7% | 77.8% | Tract 8356.00 | |
| Tract 8357.00 | 100% | 66.7% | 100% | 90.9% | 57.1% | 89.5% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | Tract 8357.00 | |
| Tract 8358.00 | 88.9% | 84.4% | 87.9% | 88.2% | 82.4% | 86.1% | 83.3% | 84.6% | 94.7% | 75% | Tract 8358.00 | |
| Tract 8359.00 | 77.2% | 83% | 81.3% | 77.8% | 90.2% | 88.5% | 83.3% | 90% | 80.4% | 83.7% | Tract 8359.00 | |
| Tract 8360.00 | 68.6% | 78.6% | 96.4% | 76.3% | 97.4% | 95.8% | 96.4% | 87.9% | 92% | 85.7% | Tract 8360.00 | About 63% housing and 66% population |
| Tract 8361.00 | 64.7% | 96.6% | 90.5% | 79.3% | 94.4% | 72% | 91.4% | 88.6% | 85% | 66.7% | Tract 8361.00 | About 100% housing and 100% population |
| Tract 8392.00 | 93.5% | 92.1% | 89.6% | 92.5% | 90.1% | 90.3% | 94% | 86.1% | 82.5% | 89.3% | Tract 8392.00 | About 28% housing and 26% population |
| Tract 8395.00 | 68.8% | 75% | 64.3% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 57.1% | 75% | 76.9% | 75% | 100% | Tract 8395.00 | About 63% housing and 57% population |
| Tract 8396.00 | 61.1% | 92.9% | 75% | 91.7% | 56.3% | 66.7% | 80% | 83.3% | 85.7% | 71.4% | Tract 8396.00 | About 81% housing and 83% population |
| Tract 8410.00 | 71.4% | 88.9% | 92.6% | 100% | 80% | 82.6% | 100% | 95.2% | 100% | 92.3% | Tract 8410.00 | About 64% housing and 57% population |
| Tract 8411.00 | 80% | 75% | 70.4% | 81.8% | 66.7% | 87.5% | 71.4% | 85.7% | 100% | 90.9% | Tract 8411.00 | About 0% housing and 0% population |
| Tract 8420.00 | 100% | 100% | 80% | 81.8% | 88.9% | 100% | 100% | 50% | 100% | 100% | Tract 8420.00 | About 76% housing and 94% population |
| Tract 8426.00 | 56.7% | 73.7% | 93.1% | 83.3% | 80% | 80% | 94.4% | 95.7% | 58.8% | 82.4% | Tract 8426.00 | About 2% housing and 2% population |
| Tract 8438.00 | 76.7% | 52.2% | 83.3% | 76.2% | 82.6% | 80% | 68.4% | 83.3% | 75% | 90% | Tract 8438.00 | About 15% housing and 21% population |
Ward 3 contains partial census tracts. The value calculated for Ward 3 is based its boundaries. Census tracts are presented with their full values based on their boundaries. The percentages noted are for informational purposes only.
